Does a Pool Use More Water Than a Lawn? Pool vs Lawn Water Use in 25 US Cities

Does a pool use more water than a lawn? Per square foot, usually not. A 2026 PC&S model of 25 US cities finds an uncovered pool uses less than a sprinkler-watered cool-season lawn in 22. Versus warm-season grass the gap is small or rain-dependent, with the pool higher only in Las Vegas and Phoenix. Pool figures count evaporation only.
Does a pool use more water than a lawn, city by city
Per 1,000 sq ft, an uncovered pool and a sprinkler-watered lawn lose water at similar rates, because open water and well-watered grass respond to the same sun, heat and wind. The pool comes out lower than cool-season grass in 22 of 25 cities and close to warm-season grass in most.

The pool figures come from the PC&S evaporation model in our pool evaporation report: NOAA Class A pan evaporation for 1956 to 1970 multiplied by the NOAA TR 33 pan coefficient of 0.7, then reduced by NOAA 1991-2020 normal monthly rainfall. The lawn figures use gridMET grass reference evapotranspiration (ETo) for 1991 to 2020 at the same weather stations, the monthly UC ANR turf crop coefficients (annual averages 0.80 for cool-season and 0.60 for warm-season grass), the same monthly rainfall, and the California MWELO sprinkler efficiency of 0.75.
| City | Pool net loss after rain (gal per 1,000 sq ft/yr) | Cool-season lawn, sprinkler water applied (gal per 1,000 sq ft/yr) | Warm-season lawn, sprinkler water applied (gal per 1,000 sq ft/yr) | Pool to cool-season lawn, after rain (ratio) | Pool to cool-season lawn, no rain credit (ratio) | Pool to warm-season lawn, after rain (ratio) | Pool to warm-season lawn, no rain credit (ratio) | Verdict vs cool-season lawn | Verdict vs warm-season lawn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Las Vegas, NV | 49493 | 53170 | 42137 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 1.17 | 1.14 | About even | Pool uses more |
| Phoenix, AZ | 42137 | 43945 | 34159 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 1.23 | 1.16 | About even | Pool uses more |
| Tucson, AZ | 42013 | 48059 | 37213 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 1.13 | 1.06 | Lawn uses more | Depends on rainfall |
| Albuquerque, NM | 33348 | 39769 | 30668 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 1.09 | 1.02 | Lawn uses more | About even |
| Fresno, CA | 27177 | 39395 | 30481 | 0.69 | 0.7 | 0.89 | 0.88 | Lawn uses more | Lawn uses more |
| Riverside, CA | 24746 | 36403 | 28424 | 0.68 | 0.7 | 0.87 | 0.86 | Lawn uses more | Lawn uses more |
| Sacramento, CA | 23749 | 32476 | 24746 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.96 | 0.94 | Lawn uses more | About even |
| Salt Lake City, UT | 22066 | 26554 | 19386 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 1.14 | 1.02 | Lawn uses more | Depends on rainfall |
| Los Angeles, CA | 21256 | 27177 | 21006 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 1.01 | 1.01 | Lawn uses more | About even |
| San Diego, CA | 20321 | 28549 | 22191 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.92 | 0.9 | Lawn uses more | About even |
| Denver, CO | 19635 | 25058 | 17890 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 1.1 | 0.96 | Lawn uses more | About even |
| San Antonio, TX | 13215 | 19573 | 11906 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 1.11 | 0.89 | Lawn uses more | Depends on rainfall |
| Fort Worth, TX | 12217 | 18949 | 11656 | 0.64 | 0.72 | 1.05 | 0.9 | Lawn uses more | About even |
| Dallas, TX | 11781 | 18451 | 11158 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 1.06 | 0.9 | Lawn uses more | About even |
| Austin, TX | 11095 | 18513 | 11220 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.99 | 0.86 | Lawn uses more | Depends on rainfall |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 7106 | 12841 | 5672 | 0.55 | 0.69 | 1.25 | 0.86 | Lawn uses more | Depends on rainfall |
| Tampa, FL | 7044 | 9724 | 6046 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 1.16 | 0.93 | Lawn uses more | Depends on rainfall |
| Orlando, FL | 5735 | 7106 | 3927 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 1.46 | 0.93 | Lawn uses more | Depends on rainfall |
| Miami-Dade County (Miami), FL | 4488 | 5735 | 3304 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 1.36 | 0.89 | Lawn uses more | Depends on rainfall |
| Charlotte, NC | 3553 | 8103 | 2743 | 0.44 | 0.69 | 1.3 | 0.86 | Lawn uses more | Depends on rainfall |
| Houston, TX | 2057 | 7044 | 1932 | 0.29 | 0.7 | 1.06 | 0.87 | Lawn uses more | Depends on rainfall |
| Nashville, TN | 1808 | 4675 | 997 | 0.39 | 0.67 | 1.81 | 0.83 | Lawn uses more | Depends on rainfall |
| Atlanta, GA | 1621 | 6794 | 1434 | 0.24 | 0.67 | 1.13 | 0.82 | Lawn uses more | Depends on rainfall |
| Raleigh, NC | 1558 | 6420 | 1683 | 0.24 | 0.66 | 0.93 | 0.81 | Lawn uses more | Depends on rainfall |
| New Orleans, LA | 0 | 623 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.67 | 0.83 | Both near zero after rain | Both near zero after rain |
Source: PC&S calculation from NOAA TR 34, NOAA 1991-2020 Normals, gridMET, UC ANR and California MWELO. Download CSV
Modelled. Pool counts evaporation only.
Source: PC&S calculation from NOAA TR 34, NOAA 1991-2020 Normals, gridMET, UC ANR, California MWELO. Download chart data (CSV)
A result is labelled ‘Pool uses more’ or ‘Lawn uses more’ only when the gap exceeds 10% both with full monthly rain credit and with no rain credit. On that test, the pool exceeds a warm-season lawn’s water use only in Las Vegas (1.17 after rain) and Phoenix (1.23), and the lawn uses more in Fresno (0.89) and Riverside (0.87).
New Orleans omitted: both values are zero.
Source: PC&S calculation. Download chart data (CSV)
Why rainfall decides the pool vs lawn answer in humid cities
In dry cities the comparison barely moves with rainfall, but in humid cities both the pool and the lawn need little added water and the ratio swings. The rain treatment matters more than any other choice in the model.
| City | Pool evaporation, gross (in/yr) | Normal precipitation 1991-2020 (in/yr) | Pool net after rain (in/yr) | Grass reference ET, gridMET 1991-2020 (in/yr) | Cool-season turf ET (in/yr) | Warm-season turf ET (in/yr) | Cool-season net irrigation need (in/yr) | Warm-season net irrigation need (in/yr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Las Vegas, NV | 83.6 | 4.18 | 79.4 | 80.7 | 68.1 | 54.8 | 63.9 | 50.7 |
| Phoenix, AZ | 74.8 | 7.22 | 67.6 | 71.1 | 60.1 | 48.3 | 52.8 | 41.1 |
| Tucson, AZ | 78.0 | 10.61 | 67.4 | 82.2 | 68.4 | 55.4 | 57.8 | 44.8 |
| Albuquerque, NM | 62.4 | 8.84 | 53.5 | 67.4 | 56.7 | 45.7 | 47.8 | 36.9 |
| Fresno, CA | 51.9 | 10.99 | 43.6 | 64.9 | 55.4 | 44.4 | 47.4 | 36.7 |
| Riverside, CA | 48.6 | 9.37 | 39.7 | 63.2 | 52.3 | 42.4 | 43.8 | 34.2 |
| Sacramento, CA | 48.8 | 18.14 | 38.1 | 56.9 | 48.5 | 38.9 | 39.0 | 29.8 |
| Salt Lake City, UT | 49.5 | 15.52 | 35.4 | 53.0 | 45.4 | 36.3 | 32.0 | 23.3 |
| Los Angeles, CA | 45.5 | 12.23 | 34.1 | 50.2 | 41.5 | 33.7 | 32.7 | 25.3 |
| San Diego, CA | 42.4 | 9.79 | 32.6 | 52.5 | 43.3 | 35.2 | 34.4 | 26.7 |
| Denver, CO | 46.0 | 14.48 | 31.5 | 53.1 | 44.6 | 36.0 | 30.2 | 21.5 |
| San Antonio, TX | 53.6 | 32.38 | 21.2 | 67.0 | 55.5 | 45.0 | 23.6 | 14.4 |
| Fort Worth, TX | 53.1 | 35.34 | 19.6 | 65.9 | 54.9 | 44.4 | 22.8 | 14.0 |
| Dallas, TX | 53.7 | 38.32 | 18.9 | 66.1 | 55.1 | 44.6 | 22.2 | 13.4 |
| Austin, TX | 51.1 | 35.57 | 17.8 | 66.1 | 54.9 | 44.4 | 22.3 | 13.5 |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 47.5 | 36.39 | 11.4 | 61.4 | 51.3 | 41.5 | 15.4 | 6.8 |
| Tampa, FL | 50.8 | 49.48 | 11.3 | 61.1 | 50.2 | 40.9 | 11.7 | 7.2 |
| Orlando, FL | 51.2 | 51.45 | 9.2 | 61.4 | 50.5 | 41.1 | 8.6 | 4.8 |
| Miami-Dade County (Miami), FL | 52.5 | 67.41 | 7.2 | 66.6 | 54.4 | 44.4 | 6.9 | 4.0 |
| Charlotte, NC | 40.7 | 43.6 | 5.7 | 52.7 | 44.1 | 35.6 | 9.8 | 3.3 |
| Houston, TX | 47.4 | 51.84 | 3.3 | 61.1 | 50.6 | 41.0 | 8.5 | 2.3 |
| Nashville, TN | 37.4 | 50.51 | 2.9 | 50.1 | 42.0 | 33.9 | 5.7 | 1.2 |
| Atlanta, GA | 40.1 | 50.43 | 2.6 | 54.3 | 45.2 | 36.6 | 8.1 | 1.8 |
| Raleigh, NC | 37.8 | 46.07 | 2.5 | 51.4 | 43.0 | 34.8 | 7.7 | 2.0 |
| New Orleans, LA | 40.6 | 63.35 | 0.0 | 54.8 | 45.3 | 36.8 | 0.8 | 0.0 |
Source: NOAA TR 34 via the PC&S evaporation model; NOAA 1991-2020 Normals; gridMET; UC ANR. Download CSV
Houston gets 51.84 inches of normal rain a year (NOAA 1991-2020), which offsets most of the pool’s 47.4 inches of evaporation and leaves 3.3 inches to top up. A warm-season lawn in Houston needs 3.1 inches of sprinkler water on the same monthly basis, so the two come to 2,057 and 1,932 gallons per 1,000 sq ft per year.
The monthly method treats every inch of rain as useful. A daily soil water balance by UF/IFAS (1980-2009) puts lawn net irrigation needs at 23.6 inches a year in Orlando and 27.6 in Tampa, far above this model’s monthly estimates of 4.8 and 7.2 inches for warm-season grass. Using the IFAS needs instead, the pool uses 0.29 times the lawn’s water in Orlando and 0.31 times in Tampa.
Source: PC&S calculation. Download chart data (CSV)
Pool vs lawn water use for the same backyard footprint
A backyard pool comes with a deck or coping, and that paved area needs no irrigation water. With a deck ring 2 ft wide, the pool plus deck uses no more water than a warm-season lawn of the same footprint in 22 of 24 cities modelled.
| City | 15 x 30 ft pool, net gallons per year | 450 sq ft cool-season lawn, gallons per year | 450 sq ft warm-season lawn, gallons per year | Cool-season lawn area using the same water (sq ft) | Warm-season lawn area using the same water (sq ft) | Deck ring width at which pool plus deck matches warm-season lawn (ft) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Las Vegas, NV | 22272 | 23927 | 18962 | 419 | 529 | 0.8 |
| Phoenix, AZ | 18963 | 19775 | 15371 | 431 | 555 | 1.1 |
| Tucson, AZ | 18907 | 21627 | 16746 | 393 | 508 | 0.6 |
| Albuquerque, NM | 15011 | 17896 | 13801 | 377 | 489 | 0.4 |
| Fresno, CA | 12233 | 17728 | 13716 | 310 | 401 | 0.0 |
| Riverside, CA | 11123 | 16381 | 12791 | 306 | 392 | 0.0 |
| Sacramento, CA | 10681 | 14614 | 11136 | 329 | 432 | 0.0 |
| Salt Lake City, UT | 9917 | 11949 | 8724 | 374 | 512 | 0.7 |
| Los Angeles, CA | 9567 | 12230 | 9453 | 352 | 455 | 0.1 |
| San Diego, CA | 9141 | 12847 | 9986 | 320 | 412 | 0.0 |
| Denver, CO | 8831 | 11276 | 8050 | 353 | 494 | 0.5 |
| San Antonio, TX | 5940 | 8808 | 5358 | 304 | 499 | 0.5 |
| Fort Worth, TX | 5496 | 8527 | 5245 | 290 | 472 | 0.2 |
| Dallas, TX | 5315 | 8303 | 5021 | 287 | 475 | 0.3 |
| Austin, TX | 4980 | 8331 | 5049 | 270 | 445 | 0.0 |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 3202 | 5778 | 2553 | 249 | 564 | 1.2 |
| Tampa, FL | 3161 | 4376 | 2721 | 326 | 524 | 0.8 |
| Orlando, FL | 2567 | 3198 | 1767 | 363 | 657 | 2.1 |
| Miami-Dade County (Miami), FL | 2029 | 2581 | 1487 | 352 | 611 | 1.7 |
| Charlotte, NC | 1598 | 3646 | 1234 | 197 | 583 | 1.4 |
| Houston, TX | 916 | 3170 | 870 | 131 | 479 | 0.3 |
| Nashville, TN | 808 | 2104 | 449 | 174 | 816 | 3.5 |
| Atlanta, GA | 734 | 3057 | 645 | 107 | 509 | 0.6 |
| Raleigh, NC | 713 | 2889 | 757 | 109 | 417 | 0.0 |
| New Orleans, LA | 0 | 281 | 0 | 0 |
Source: PC&S calculation; inputs as in the city table. Download CSV
In Phoenix, a 15 x 30 ft pool loses 18,963 gallons a year after rain, the same as a 555 sq ft warm-season lawn. A deck ring 1.1 ft wide brings the pool and deck footprint to that size. In the 11 arid cities, no city needs a deck ring wider than 1.1 ft, and 22 of 24 cities need 2 ft or less.
Source: PC&S calculation. Download chart data (CSV)
How pool covers and grass type change the comparison
A pool cover changes the answer more than anything else a homeowner controls. Grass type matters too: in Phoenix a warm-season lawn needs 34,159 gallons per 1,000 sq ft per year against 43,945 for cool-season grass.
| City | Uncovered pool (gal per 1,000 sq ft/yr) | Pool, cover cuts evaporation 30% (DOE low) | Pool, cover cuts evaporation 50% (DOE high) | Pool, cover cuts evaporation 90% (EPA solid cover) | Cool-season lawn, full quality | Warm-season lawn, full quality | Cool-season lawn, survival (60% of ETo) | Warm-season lawn, survival (40% of ETo) | Low-water plants on drip (plant factor 0.3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Las Vegas, NV | 49493 | 33854 | 23437 | 3225 | 53170 | 42137 | 36777 | 23313 | 15396 |
| Phoenix, AZ | 42137 | 28150 | 18822 | 1605 | 43945 | 34159 | 29421 | 17640 | 11095 |
| Tucson, AZ | 42013 | 27425 | 17700 | 1320 | 48059 | 37213 | 32164 | 18513 | 10784 |
| Albuquerque, NM | 33348 | 21699 | 13925 | 535 | 39769 | 30668 | 26305 | 15085 | 8789 |
| Fresno, CA | 27177 | 18077 | 12298 | 1796 | 39395 | 30481 | 25868 | 16144 | 10784 |
| Riverside, CA | 24746 | 16544 | 11254 | 1543 | 36403 | 28424 | 24559 | 15396 | 10098 |
| Sacramento, CA | 23749 | 16013 | 10865 | 1513 | 32476 | 24746 | 21131 | 13152 | 8540 |
| Salt Lake City, UT | 22066 | 13519 | 8350 | 405 | 26554 | 19386 | 15521 | 8228 | 4737 |
| Los Angeles, CA | 21256 | 13994 | 9256 | 1174 | 27177 | 21006 | 17827 | 10908 | 7106 |
| San Diego, CA | 20321 | 13038 | 8611 | 1027 | 28549 | 22191 | 18887 | 11532 | 7418 |
| Denver, CO | 19635 | 11028 | 5298 | 0 | 25058 | 17890 | 14399 | 5610 | 1621 |
| San Antonio, TX | 13215 | 5189 | 1836 | 0 | 19573 | 11906 | 7729 | 1808 | 374 |
| Fort Worth, TX | 12217 | 5099 | 2013 | 0 | 18949 | 11656 | 7355 | 2182 | 686 |
| Dallas, TX | 11781 | 5078 | 2294 | 0 | 18451 | 11158 | 7293 | 2556 | 1060 |
| Austin, TX | 11095 | 4581 | 1540 | 0 | 18513 | 11220 | 7480 | 1808 | 374 |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 7106 | 1527 | 0 | 0 | 12841 | 5672 | 2867 | 0 | 0 |
| Tampa, FL | 7044 | 2714 | 433 | 0 | 9724 | 6046 | 3927 | 249 | 0 |
| Orlando, FL | 5735 | 1161 | 62 | 0 | 7106 | 3927 | 1745 | 0 | 0 |
| Miami-Dade County (Miami), FL | 4488 | 1086 | 0 | 0 | 5735 | 3304 | 2057 | 0 | 0 |
| Charlotte, NC | 3553 | 95 | 0 | 0 | 8103 | 2743 | 686 | 0 | 0 |
| Houston, TX | 2057 | 290 | 0 | 0 | 7044 | 1932 | 748 | 0 | 0 |
| Nashville, TN | 1808 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4675 | 997 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Atlanta, GA | 1621 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6794 | 1434 | 249 | 0 | 0 |
| Raleigh, NC | 1558 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6420 | 1683 | 187 | 0 | 0 |
| New Orleans, LA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 623 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Source: PC&S calculation; cover cuts from DOE and EPA; survival levels from UC ANR; plant factor and drip efficiency from California MWELO. Download CSV
In Las Vegas, a cover that cuts evaporation by 50% brings the pool from 49,493 to 23,437 gallons per 1,000 sq ft per year, and a solid cover cutting 90% (EPA: more than 90%) brings it to 3,225. A warm-season lawn in Las Vegas still needs 42,137.
UC ANR reports that cool-season grass survives with brown patches at about 60% of ETo and warm-season grass gives minimal cover at about 40%. At those levels a Las Vegas lawn needs 36,777 (cool-season) or 23,313 (warm-season) gallons per 1,000 sq ft per year, less than the uncovered pool.
Scenario: cover cuts evaporation 50% (top of DOE 30% to 50% range).
Source: PC&S calculation; DOE cover range; MWELO plant factor. Download chart data (CSV)

How the pool vs lawn model compares with official water agency figures
Official ETo and turf figures from California, Arizona, Florida and Southern Nevada broadly agree with the model in dry cities, and suggest the model is generous to lawns in Florida. No official figure reverses the main reading.
| City | Official source | Official value | This model | Difference (%) | Pool vs lawn ratio with official figure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phoenix, AZ | Turf ET, acceptable quality, overseeded bermudagrass, AZMET AZ1313/AZ1314 (1987-2000), in/yr | 49.9 | 48.3 | -3.2 | 1.5 (gross pool evaporation / turf ET) |
| Tucson, AZ | Turf ET, acceptable quality, overseeded bermudagrass, AZMET AZ1313/AZ1314 (1987-2000), in/yr | 51.1 | 55.4 | 8.4 | 1.53 (gross pool evaporation / turf ET) |
| Fresno, CA | Grass reference ET, MWELO Appendix C (Spatial CIMIS 2004-2021), in/yr | 57.0 | 64.9 | 13.9 | cool 0.8, warm 1.04 |
| Riverside, CA | Grass reference ET, MWELO Appendix C (Spatial CIMIS 2004-2021), in/yr | 59.4 | 63.2 | 6.4 | cool 0.72, warm 0.91 |
| Sacramento, CA | Grass reference ET, MWELO Appendix C (Spatial CIMIS 2004-2021), in/yr | 55.2 | 56.9 | 3.1 | cool 0.77, warm 1.01 |
| Los Angeles, CA | Grass reference ET, MWELO Appendix C (Spatial CIMIS 2004-2021), in/yr | 50.0 | 50.2 | 0.4 | cool 0.79, warm 1.02 |
| San Diego, CA | Grass reference ET, MWELO Appendix C (Spatial CIMIS 2004-2021), in/yr | 47.9 | 52.5 | 9.6 | cool 0.79, warm 1.02 |
| Tampa, FL | Grass reference ET, UF/IFAS AE481 (1980-2009), in/yr | 59.5 | 61.1 | 2.7 | |
| Tampa, FL | Turf net irrigation requirement, UF/IFAS AE482 daily soil water balance (1980-2009), in/yr | 27.6 | 7.2 | -73.9 | 0.31 (IFAS need / 0.75) |
| Orlando, FL | Grass reference ET, UF/IFAS AE481 (1980-2009), in/yr | 57.9 | 61.4 | 6.0 | |
| Orlando, FL | Turf net irrigation requirement, UF/IFAS AE482 daily soil water balance (1980-2009), in/yr | 23.6 | 4.8 | -79.7 | 0.29 (IFAS need / 0.75) |
| Miami-Dade County (Miami), FL | Grass reference ET, UF/IFAS AE481 (1980-2009), in/yr | 65.3 | 66.6 | 2.0 | |
| Miami-Dade County (Miami), FL | Turf net irrigation requirement, UF/IFAS AE482 daily soil water balance (1980-2009), in/yr | 37.6 | 4.0 | -89.4 | 0.14 (IFAS need / 0.75) |
| Las Vegas, NV | SNWA: pool evaporation 48.6 gal per sq ft per year vs grass-to-desert conversion saving 55.0 gal per sq ft per year | 48.6 vs 55.0 | 0.88 (SNWA figures only) |
Sources: MWELO Appendix C, AZMET AZ1314, AZMET AZ1313, UF/IFAS AE481, UF/IFAS AE482, SNWA. Download CSV
gridMET reads higher than the official California ETo table in all 5 California cities, from 0.4% in Los Angeles to 13.9% in Fresno. A 2026 EarthArXiv preprint found gridMET overestimates ETo by 10% to 20% at most irrigated cropland stations, with pockets of underestimation in the arid West.
If gridMET ETo is 15% too high everywhere, the pool would exceed a warm-season lawn by more than 10% in 20 cities on the rain-credited basis, mostly humid cities where both figures are a few thousand gallons or less. Against cool-season grass the pool would exceed the lawn in only 3.
Pool and lawn water rules in 2025 and 2026
Most of the rules cited below target nonfunctional grass and lawn watering days. The pool rule is Southern Nevada’s size cap on new residential pools.
| Jurisdiction | Rule | Applies to | Status or date | Official source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Southern Nevada (SNWA, LVVWD and local jurisdictions) | 600 sq ft surface-area limit on new residential pools | New residential pools | Resolution approved July 2022 | https://www.snwa.com/landscapes/pools-and-spas/index.html |
| Nevada (AB 356, 2021) | No Colorado River water for nonfunctional grass | Commercial, multi-family, government properties; not single-family yards | Beginning 2027 | https://www.snwa.com/conservation/understand-laws-ordinances/index.html |
| California (AB 1572, Chapter 849, 2023) | No potable water for nonfunctional turf | Commercial, industrial, institutional, HOA common areas; not single-family yards | Phased: Jan 1, 2027 to Jan 1, 2031 | https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB1572 |
| California (MWELO, 23 CCR ch. 2.7) | New ETo table (Spatial CIMIS 2004-2021); residential ET adjustment factor max 0.55 | New and rehabilitated landscapes | Operative Jan 2, 2025 | https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/california/23-CCR-2-Chapter-2-7-app-C |
| Colorado (SB24-005) | Local governments may not allow new nonfunctional turf | Commercial, institutional, industrial, common-interest property | On and after Jan 1, 2026 | https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb24-005 |
| Denver Water | Stage 1 drought: single-family lawns watered no more than 2 days a week | Single-family residential | Declared Mar 25, 2026; drought pricing through Apr 30, 2027 | https://www.denverwater.org/tap/denver-board-water-commissioners-declares-stage-1-drought-implements-mandatory-watering |
| Austin Water | Once-per-week automatic irrigation year-round; Conservation Stage | All customers | Conservation Stage since Sept 2, 2025 | https://www.austintexas.gov/water/austin-water-drought-response |
| City of Tampa | Once-per-week watering on designated day, only before 4 a.m. or after 8 p.m. | All customers | Effective Apr 3, 2026 | https://www.tampa.gov/water/conservation/watering-days-and-hours |
| San Antonio Water System | Stage 3: sprinklers on one designated day; surcharge at 20,000+ gal a month | Residential customers | Stage 3 in effect (2026) | https://www.saws.org/saws-customers-return-to-stage-3-watering-rules/ |
| Dallas Water Utilities | Maximum twice-weekly sprinkler watering; none 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. | All customers | Permanent since Apr 23, 2012 | https://savedallaswater.com/frequently-asked-questions/ |
| Fort Worth Water | Twice-a-week sprinkler schedule with assigned days | All customers | Permanent | https://www.fortworthtexas.gov/departments/water/savefwwater/irrigation/twice-per-week |
| Los Angeles (LADWP) | Phase 2: sprinklers 3 assigned days a week (odd or even addresses), 8 minutes per station | All customers | Phase 2 current | https://www.ladwp.com/who-we-are/water-system/water-conservation/water-conservation-ordinance |
Sources: official pages linked in each row. Download CSV

Fill and refill restrictions on pools in drought stages are tracked city by city in our cost to fill a pool report. Swim-season length by city, which affects how long a cover can stay on, is in our pool season length report.
Scenarios we modeled
Annual gallons, pool vs lawn, per city
How many gallons does an uncovered pool lose compared with a lawn of the same area in each city?
Pool: sum over months of max(0, pan x 0.70 - rain) x 623.3. Lawn: sum over months of max(0, Kc x ETo - rain) / 0.75 x 623.3 (gallons per 1,000 sq ft).Inputs: TR 34 pan rows, NOAA normals rows, gridMET rows, UC ANR Kc rows, MWELO efficiency row (see derived.csv)
Limitations: Pan data are from 1956 to 1970; Kc values are California-derived; rain is fully credited month by month; sprinkler efficiency is a California regulatory default.
Which wins by climate
Where does the pool use more, and where does the lawn?
Ratio = pool / lawn on two rain bases (full monthly credit and none); verdict only when both agree beyond 10%.Inputs: Same as above plus gross pan and turf ET rows
Limitations: Humid-city ratios compare small numbers and are sensitive to the rain method.
Pool cover scenario
How much does a cover change the comparison?
Covered pool = sum of max(0, (1 - cut) x FWS - rain), cut = 30%, 50% (DOE) or 90% (EPA solid).Inputs: DOE 30% and 50% rows, EPA 90% row
Limitations: Assumes the cover is used as rated and rain still reaches the water; EPA reports only 15% of owners regularly use a cover.
Turf type scenario
How much does grass type change lawn water use?
Cool-season monthly Kc (annual 0.80) vs warm-season monthly Kc (annual 0.60), plus survival levels of 60% and 40% of ETo.Inputs: UC ANR Kc and survival rows
Limitations: Coefficients were measured in California; Arizona extension data (AZ1195) give a 0.6 to 0.8 range for bermudagrass.
Footprint break-even deck width
How wide a deck makes a pool plus deck use no more water than a lawn of the same footprint?
Break-even lawn area = 450 x pool net / lawn applied; deck ring w solves (15 + 2w)(30 + 2w) = break-even area.Inputs: Derived pool and lawn rows per city
Limitations: Decks are assumed to use no water; hosing, splash-out and shading are not modelled.
What the comparison shows
- In a PC&S model of 25 US cities (1991 to 2020 climate), an uncovered pool used less water per square foot than a sprinkler-watered cool-season lawn in 22 cities and about the same in Las Vegas and Phoenix, using NOAA pan data and UC ANR turf coefficients.
- Against warm-season grass such as bermudagrass, the pool used more in 2 cities (Las Vegas and Phoenix), less in 2 (Fresno and Riverside), about the same in 7, and the answer depended on how rain is counted in 13.
- In Las Vegas, an uncovered pool loses 49,493 gallons per 1,000 sq ft per year after rain, against 53,170 for a cool-season lawn and 42,137 for a warm-season lawn (1991 to 2020 climate).
- The Southern Nevada Water Authority puts average pool evaporation at 48.6 gallons per square foot per year, while its Water Smart Landscapes program projects 55.0 gallons saved per square foot of grass replaced (2026 pages).
- A cover that cuts evaporation by 50%, the top of the DOE 30% to 50% range, puts the pool at least 10% below a warm-season lawn in 24 of 24 cities with any modelled water need.
- Per footprint, a 15 x 30 ft pool plus a deck ring at least 1.1 ft wide uses no more water than a warm-season lawn of the same footprint in all 11 arid cities in the model.
- Low-water plants on drip irrigation need far less than either: a pool uses 2.5 to 12.1 times as much water as a planting at the top of the California MWELO low-water range in the 11 arid cities.
Results
- Las Vegas: an uncovered pool loses 49,493 gallons per 1,000 sq ft per year after normal rain, vs 53,170 for a sprinkler-watered cool-season lawn (PC&S model; NOAA 1956-1970 pan data, gridMET 1991-2020 ETo).
- Phoenix: pool 42,137 gallons per 1,000 sq ft per year vs 43,945 for a cool-season lawn and 34,159 for a warm-season lawn (1991-2020 climate, PC&S model).
- Phoenix: University of Arizona AZMET data put acceptable-quality lawn water use at 49.9 inches a year (1987-2000), while modelled pool evaporation is 74.8 inches, a ratio of 1.5 before sprinkler losses.
- Fresno: pool 27,177 gallons per 1,000 sq ft per year vs 30,481 for a warm-season lawn, one of 2 cities where the pool uses at least 10% less than warm-season grass on both rain bases (1991-2020, PC&S model).
- Los Angeles: pool 21,256 vs warm-season lawn 21,006 gallons per 1,000 sq ft per year, a ratio of 1.01 (1991-2020, PC&S model).
- Dallas: pool 11,781 vs cool-season lawn 18,451 gallons per 1,000 sq ft per year after rain (1991-2020 NOAA normals, PC&S model).
- Atlanta: normal rainfall of 50.43 inches a year (NOAA 1991-2020) leaves an uncovered pool needing 1,621 gallons per 1,000 sq ft per year, against 6,794 for a cool-season lawn (PC&S model).
- Across the 11 arid cities (under 20 inches of rain, NOAA 1991-2020), the median pool loses 24,746 gallons per 1,000 sq ft per year, vs medians of 36,403 for cool-season and 28,424 for warm-season lawns (PC&S model).
- Across the 9 humid cities (40 inches of rain or more), the medians are 2,057 gallons per 1,000 sq ft per year for a pool, 6,794 for a cool-season lawn and 1,932 for a warm-season lawn (PC&S model, 1991-2020).
- Southern Nevada: average pool evaporation is 48.6 gallons per square foot per year (SNWA), and SNWA projects 825,000 gallons a year saved for an average 15,000 sq ft grass conversion (SNWA), or 55.0 gallons per square foot.
- United States: a pool cover can prevent up to 95% of evaporation (EPA WaterSense), but only 15% of pool owners have and regularly use one (EPA, citing the 2016 Residential End Uses of Water study).
- California: swapping gridMET ETo for the official MWELO Appendix C values (Spatial CIMIS 2004-2021) gives pool to lawn ratios of 0.91 to 1.04 for warm-season grass and 0.72 to 0.8 for cool-season grass in the 5 California cities.
- Florida: UF/IFAS daily soil water balances (1980-2009) put lawn net irrigation needs at 23.6 inches a year in Orlando, 27.6 in Tampa and 37.6 in Miami, several times the monthly-normal estimates in this model.
- United States: residential outdoor water use is nearly 8 billion gallons a day, mainly for landscape irrigation (EPA WaterSense).
Questions owners ask
Does a pool use more water than grass?
Usually not per square foot. In a PC&S model of 25 cities (1991-2020 climate), the pool used less than cool-season grass in 22 cities and more than warm-season grass only in Las Vegas and Phoenix.
How much water does a lawn use per year?
Sprinkler water for a cool-season lawn ranges from 623 gallons per 1,000 sq ft per year in New Orleans to 53,170 in Las Vegas in the PC&S model (1991-2020). In Phoenix, AZMET measured-coefficient estimates put acceptable lawn water use at 49.9 inches a year before rain and sprinkler losses (1987-2000).
Is a pool bad for water conservation?
An uncovered pool in a desert city loses about as much water as a lawn of the same area: 42,137 vs 43,945 gallons per 1,000 sq ft per year in Phoenix (PC&S model). The Southern Nevada Water Authority says a properly managed pool can be an appropriate use of water and recommends covers, which it says cut evaporation 90%.
Do pools waste water in drought?
Evaporation continues in drought, and it peaks in the hottest months. Southern Nevada caps new pools at 600 sq ft of surface (SNWA, 2022), and several drought plans restrict pool filling; see our fill-cost report. A cover can prevent up to 95% of evaporation (EPA).
How much water does a pool use compared to a garden?
Far more than a low-water garden. In the 11 arid cities modelled, an uncovered pool uses 2.5 to 12.1 times the water of drip-irrigated low-water plants at a plant factor of 0.3 (California MWELO range 0.1 to 0.3); in Las Vegas that is 49,493 vs 15,396 gallons per 1,000 sq ft per year.
Prices and rules used
- City of Tampa: once-per-week lawn watering, now limited to before 4 a.m. or after 8 p.m., effective April 3, 2026.
- Denver Water declared a Stage 1 drought on March 25, 2026, limiting single-family lawns to 2 watering days a week, with drought pricing through April 30, 2027.
- Colorado SB24-005: on and after January 1, 2026, local governments may not allow new nonfunctional turf on commercial, institutional, industrial or common-interest property.
- Austin Water moved to Conservation Stage restrictions on September 2, 2025, keeping once-per-week automatic irrigation.
- California’s MWELO Appendix C ETo table was replaced, operative January 2, 2025, with Spatial CIMIS averages for 2004 to 2021.
- Coming: Nevada’s ban on Colorado River water for nonfunctional grass (SNWA) and the first phase of California’s AB 1572 potable-water turf ban both start January 1, 2027; neither covers single-family yards.
More questions
Does a pool use more water than a lawn in Arizona?
In Phoenix the uncovered pool and a cool-season lawn are about even (42,137 vs 43,945 gallons per 1,000 sq ft per year), and the pool uses more than warm-season grass (34,159). In Tucson the pool uses less than cool-season grass (PC&S model, 1991-2020; AZMET cross-check).
Does a pool use more water than a lawn in Las Vegas?
SNWA figures put pool evaporation at 48.6 gallons per square foot per year and grass-conversion savings at 55.0 (SNWA). The PC&S model gives 49,493 gallons per 1,000 sq ft for the pool vs 53,170 for cool-season and 42,137 for warm-season grass.
How much water does a pool lose to evaporation per year?
How much water does a pool cover save compared with a lawn?
The DOE says a cover cuts make-up water by 30% to 50%. At 50%, a Las Vegas pool drops to 23,437 gallons per 1,000 sq ft per year, below the 42,137 a warm-season lawn needs (PC&S model).
Which grass uses the least water?
Warm-season grasses (bermudagrass, zoysiagrass, St. Augustinegrass) need about 20% less water than cool-season grasses during the growing season, per UC ANR. Their annual average crop coefficient is 0.60 vs 0.80 for cool-season grass.
What is reference evapotranspiration (ETo)?
ETo is the water a well-watered grass reference surface would lose to evaporation and transpiration. This report uses gridMET grass ETo for 1991 to 2020, which ranges from 50.1 inches a year in Nashville to 82.2 in Tucson at the 25 stations.
Does rain fill a pool back up?
Partly. NOAA 1991-2020 normal rain offsets most pool evaporation in the Southeast: an Atlanta pool loses 40.1 inches a year but needs only 2.6 inches of top-up after rain, while a Las Vegas pool still needs 79.4 of its 83.6 inches (PC&S model).
Are new pools restricted to save water anywhere?
Yes. Southern Nevada supports a 600 sq ft surface-area limit on new residential pools under a July 2022 resolution, projected to save more than 32 million gallons over 10 years (SNWA).
Are lawns being banned?
Not in single-family yards in the rules cited here. Nevada bars Colorado River water for nonfunctional grass on non-single-family property from 2027 (SNWA); California’s AB 1572 phases in a potable-water ban from January 1, 2027 (California Legislature); Colorado bars new nonfunctional turf on commercial and common-interest property from January 1, 2026 (Colorado General Assembly).
How many US households use a pool cover?
Only 15% of pool owners have and regularly use a pool cover, according to the 2016 Residential End Uses of Water study cited by EPA WaterSense.
Inputs, formulas and caveats
- Took pool evaporation for 25 cities from the PC&S evaporation model: NOAA TR 34 monthly Class A pan evaporation (1956 to 1970; Riverside 1925 to 1978) x 0.70 (NOAA TR 33).
- Downloaded daily gridMET grass reference ET for 1991 to 2020 at the grid cell nearest each NOAA normals station and averaged monthly totals over 30 years (scripts/fetch_gridmet.py, scripts/compute_eto.py).
- Multiplied monthly ETo by UC ANR monthly crop coefficients for cool-season and warm-season turfgrass.
- Subtracted NOAA 1991-2020 normal monthly precipitation from both pool evaporation and turf ET, month by month, floored at zero; also ran a no-rain-credit version.
- Divided lawn net needs by the California MWELO overhead irrigation efficiency of 0.75 to get sprinkler water applied; drip plantings use 0.81.
- Converted inches to gallons at 7.48 gallons per cubic foot (623.3 gallons per 1,000 sq ft per inch).
- Built scenarios for pool covers (30%, 50%, 90% evaporation cuts), lawn survival levels (60% and 40% of ETo), low-water plants (plant factor 0.3), a 15 x 30 ft footprint, and backwash and water-quality drains.
- Cross-checked against MWELO Appendix C ETo, AZMET turf consumptive use, UF/IFAS ETo and net irrigation needs, and SNWA pool and grass figures.
Included: Primary government, university and water-agency sources opened on 2026-10-07; cities with both NOAA pan data and a 1991-2020 normals station, as in the evaporation model.
Excluded: Unsourced pool vs lawn claims from builder and landscaper pages; industry association figures that could not be traced to a published dataset; see excluded.md.
Conflicting numbers: Where official ETo differs from gridMET (California, Florida) both are shown and the pool to lawn ratios are recomputed with the official values. SNWA gives two different average pool sizes (470 and 475 sq ft); both are shown.
Derived metrics: Every modelled number is in derived.csv with its formula and input fact rows, and is reproducible with scripts/compute.py from files in raw/.
Caveats
- Pool evaporation uses 1956 to 1970 pan data and a single 0.70 pan coefficient; NOAA gives a 0.64 to 0.88 range.
- Pool figures exclude backwash, splash-out, leaks, draining and heating, which add water use.
- Turf coefficients come from California research and are applied in every city.
- Monthly rain netting overstates how much rain a lawn can use in humid climates (UF/IFAS daily balances are several times higher in Florida).
- gridMET ETo can read 10% to 20% high at irrigated sites; California official ETo is 0.4% to 13.9% lower.
- Sprinkler efficiency of 0.75 is a California regulatory default; real systems vary widely.
- Results are per square foot of water or grass, not per household; lot sizes and lawn areas are not modelled.
Method last reviewed October 8, 2026.
Press and citation
Quotable results
- In a 2026 PC&S model of 25 US cities, an uncovered pool used less water per square foot than a sprinkler-watered cool-season lawn in 22 cities (1991 to 2020 climate). (UC ANR Center for Landscape & Urban Horticulture)
- An uncovered pool in Las Vegas loses 49,493 gallons per 1,000 sq ft per year after rain, vs 42,137 for a warm-season lawn (PC&S model, 1991 to 2020 climate). (NOAA National Weather Service)
- Southern Nevada’s water authority puts average pool evaporation at 48.6 gallons per square foot per year (SNWA, 2026). (Southern Nevada Water Authority)
- A pool cover cutting evaporation 50% puts the pool at least 10% below a warm-season lawn in 24 of 24 US cities modelled (PC&S scenario, 1991 to 2020 climate). (U.S. Department of Energy)
- Only 15% of US pool owners have and regularly use a pool cover (EPA WaterSense, citing the 2016 Residential End Uses of Water study). (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)
- In the 11 arid US cities modelled, a 15 x 30 ft pool with a deck ring at least 1.1 ft wide uses no more water than a warm-season lawn of the same footprint (PC&S model, 2026). (UC ANR Center for Landscape & Urban Horticulture)
Primary inputs
- Turfgrass Crop Coefficients (Kc), Table 1, UC ANR Center for Landscape & Urban Horticulture
- NOAA Technical Report NWS 34, monthly Class A pan tables, NOAA National Weather Service
- Pools and spas, Southern Nevada Water Authority
- Cal. Code Regs. tit. 23, ch. 2.7, Appendix C (Reference Evapotranspiration Table), California Department of Water Resources (via Cornell LII)
- AE482 Net Irrigation Requirements for Florida Turfgrass Lawns: Part 3, Table 3, University of Florida IFAS Extension
- AZ1314 Turfgrass Consumptive Use Values for the Phoenix Area, University of Arizona Cooperative Extension (AZMET)
- WaterSense: Making a Splash, Pool Water Efficiency guide, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Media summary
Does a pool use more water than a lawn? A 2026 Pool Construction & Service (PC&S) model compared pool evaporation with lawn irrigation in 25 US cities, using NOAA pan evaporation, NOAA 1991 to 2020 rainfall, gridMET reference evapotranspiration and University of California turf coefficients. Per square foot, an uncovered pool used less water than a sprinkler-watered cool-season lawn in 22 cities and about the same in Las Vegas and Phoenix. Against warm-season grass, the pool used more only in those two desert cities; in most humid cities the result depended on how rain is counted. A cover cutting evaporation by half put the pool at least 10% below a warm-season lawn in 24 of 24 cities. With a deck ring at least 1.1 ft wide, a 15 x 30 ft pool used no more water than a warm-season lawn of the same footprint in every arid city. Pool figures count evaporation only.
Possible headlines
- Pools use less water than cool-season lawns in 22 of 25 US cities, model finds
- Las Vegas and Phoenix are the only 2 of 25 cities modelled where an uncovered pool out-drinks a warm-season lawn
- A pool cover flips the pool vs lawn water debate in 24 of 24 cities
- SNWA figures: pool evaporation 48.6 gallons per sq ft vs 55.0 saved by removing grass
- Add a 1.1-foot deck and a desert pool uses no more water than the lawn it replaces
Citation
Pool Construction & Service. "Does a Pool Use More Water Than a Lawn? Pool vs Lawn Water Use in 25 US Cities." PC&S Research Desk, October 7, 2026. https://poolconstructionandservice.com/research/pool-vs-lawn-water-use/
License
The data tables and charts in this report are licensed under CC BY 4.0. Reuse them with this attribution: “Source: Pool Construction & Service (poolconstructionandservice.com), Does a Pool Use More Water Than a Lawn? Pool vs Lawn Water Use in 25 US Cities.” Figures from third-party sources remain subject to their publishers’ terms.
Comparison tables
- Pool vs lawn water use per 1,000 sq ft, 25 US cities (1991 to 2020 climate) CSV
- Model inputs by city: pool evaporation, rainfall, reference ET and turf ET CSV
- 15 x 30 ft pool vs lawn of the same area, with break-even lawn area and deck width CSV
- Pool cover, turf type and low-water planting scenarios by city CSV
- Cross-checks against CIMIS, AZMET, UF/IFAS and SNWA figures CSV
- Pool and turf water rules cited, as of October 2026 CSV
- Full fact sheet with sources and limitations CSV
Evidence tiers
Tier 1: primary and government sources (32)
- NOAA National Weather Service: NOAA Technical Report NWS 33
- NOAA National Weather Service: NOAA Technical Report NWS 34, monthly Class A pan tables
- NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information: U.S. Climate Normals product page
- Climatology Lab (Abatzoglou), University of California Merced: gridMET dataset description
- UC ANR Center for Landscape & Urban Horticulture: Turfgrass Crop Coefficients (Kc), Table 1
- University of Arizona Cooperative Extension: AZ1195 Converting Reference Evapotranspiration into Turf Water Use
- University of Arizona Cooperative Extension (AZMET): AZ1314 Turfgrass Consumptive Use Values for the Phoenix Area
- University of Arizona Cooperative Extension (AZMET): AZ1313 Turfgrass Consumptive Use Values for the Tucson Area
- California Department of Water Resources (via Cornell LII): Cal. Code Regs. tit. 23, sec. 490.2 (MWELO definitions)
- California Department of Water Resources (via Cornell LII): Cal. Code Regs. tit. 23, ch. 2.7, Appendix A (MWELO worksheet)
- California Department of Water Resources (via Cornell LII): Cal. Code Regs. tit. 23, ch. 2.7, Appendix C (Reference Evapotranspiration Table)
- University of Florida IFAS Extension: AE481 Net Irrigation Requirements for Florida Turfgrass Lawns: Part 2, Table 3
- University of Florida IFAS Extension: AE482 Net Irrigation Requirements for Florida Turfgrass Lawns: Part 3, Table 3
- Southern Nevada Water Authority: Pools and spas
- Southern Nevada Water Authority: Understand laws and ordinances
- Southern Nevada Water Authority: Water Smart Landscapes Rebate
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: WaterSense: Pool Water Efficiency
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: WaterSense: Making a Splash, Pool Water Efficiency guide
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: WaterSense: Outdoors
- U.S. Department of Energy: Energy Saver: Swimming Pool Covers (archived 2025-01-10; live page now 404)
- Town of Flower Mound, Texas: Pool Evaporation
- Denver Water: Stage 1 drought declaration
- Austin Water (City of Austin): Austin Water drought response
- City of Tampa Water Department: My Allowed Watering Days and Hours
- San Antonio Water System: SAWS customers return to Stage 3 watering rules
- Dallas Water Utilities (City of Dallas): Frequently asked questions
- Fort Worth Water (City of Fort Worth): Twice-a-Week SmartWatering
- Los Angeles Department of Water and Power: Water Conservation Ordinance
- California Legislature: AB-1572 Potable water: nonfunctional turf (Chapter 849, Statutes of 2023)
- Colorado General Assembly: SB24-005 Prohibit Landscaping Practices for Water Conservation
- University of Idaho Northwest Knowledge Network / Climatology Lab: gridMET daily reference ET (grass), THREDDS data catalog
- NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information: U.S. Climate Normals 1991-2020, monthly station files (example: Las Vegas)
Tier 2: trade bodies, public companies, market research (2)
- EarthArXiv preprint (OpenET team): Assessing and Correcting Bias in Gridded Reference Evapotranspiration over Agricultural Lands Across the Contiguous United States (preprint)
- Arizona Municipal Water Users Association: How Does Your Water Use Stack Up?
Tier 3: journalism and expert commentary (1)
References
- NOAA National Weather Service. NOAA Technical Report NWS 33. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- NOAA National Weather Service. NOAA Technical Report NWS 34, monthly Class A pan tables. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. U.S. Climate Normals product page. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- Climatology Lab (Abatzoglou), University of California Merced. gridMET dataset description. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- EarthArXiv preprint (OpenET team). Assessing and Correcting Bias in Gridded Reference Evapotranspiration over Agricultural Lands Across the Contiguous United States (preprint). Accessed 2026-10-07.
- UC ANR Center for Landscape & Urban Horticulture. Turfgrass Crop Coefficients (Kc), Table 1. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- University of Arizona Cooperative Extension. AZ1195 Converting Reference Evapotranspiration into Turf Water Use. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- University of Arizona Cooperative Extension (AZMET). AZ1314 Turfgrass Consumptive Use Values for the Phoenix Area. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- University of Arizona Cooperative Extension (AZMET). AZ1313 Turfgrass Consumptive Use Values for the Tucson Area. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- California Department of Water Resources (via Cornell LII). Cal. Code Regs. tit. 23, sec. 490.2 (MWELO definitions). Accessed 2026-10-07.
- California Department of Water Resources (via Cornell LII). Cal. Code Regs. tit. 23, ch. 2.7, Appendix A (MWELO worksheet). Accessed 2026-10-07.
- California Department of Water Resources (via Cornell LII). Cal. Code Regs. tit. 23, ch. 2.7, Appendix C (Reference Evapotranspiration Table). Accessed 2026-10-07.
- University of Florida IFAS Extension. AE481 Net Irrigation Requirements for Florida Turfgrass Lawns: Part 2, Table 3. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- University of Florida IFAS Extension. AE482 Net Irrigation Requirements for Florida Turfgrass Lawns: Part 3, Table 3. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- Southern Nevada Water Authority. Pools and spas. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- Southern Nevada Water Authority. Understand laws and ordinances. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- Southern Nevada Water Authority. Water Smart Landscapes Rebate. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. WaterSense: Pool Water Efficiency. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. WaterSense: Making a Splash, Pool Water Efficiency guide. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. WaterSense: Outdoors. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- U.S. Department of Energy. Energy Saver: Swimming Pool Covers (archived 2025-01-10; live page now 404). Accessed 2026-10-07.
- Arizona Municipal Water Users Association. How Does Your Water Use Stack Up?. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- Town of Flower Mound, Texas. Pool Evaporation. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- Denver Water. Stage 1 drought declaration. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- Austin Water (City of Austin). Austin Water drought response. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- City of Tampa Water Department. My Allowed Watering Days and Hours. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- San Antonio Water System. SAWS customers return to Stage 3 watering rules. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- Dallas Water Utilities (City of Dallas). Frequently asked questions. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- Fort Worth Water (City of Fort Worth). Twice-a-Week SmartWatering. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- Los Angeles Department of Water and Power. Water Conservation Ordinance. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- California Legislature. AB-1572 Potable water: nonfunctional turf (Chapter 849, Statutes of 2023). Accessed 2026-10-07.
- Colorado General Assembly. SB24-005 Prohibit Landscaping Practices for Water Conservation. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- Stanford Magazine. Watering a Lawn vs. Putting in a Pool: Essential Answer. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- University of Idaho Northwest Knowledge Network / Climatology Lab. gridMET daily reference ET (grass), THREDDS data catalog. Accessed 2026-10-07.
- NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. U.S. Climate Normals 1991-2020, monthly station files (example: Las Vegas). Accessed 2026-10-07.





